Social Security for All: Building a More Secure Future for India’s Workers

Expanding social protection is an important step towards inclusive development, but its real success will depend on accessibility, adequacy and the ability to protect workers across formal and informal employment.

S Ahmad


India’s social security framework has expanded through wider EPFO coverage, digital reforms and welfare initiatives. EPFO provides provident fund savings, pension and insurance benefits to eligible members. The increase in the mandatory coverage wage ceiling from ₹15,000 to ₹25,000 is expected to bring over 51 lakh additional employees within its ambit.

A secure livelihood is about much more than earning a monthly income. It is also about having the assurance that an individual and their family will not be left financially vulnerable when employment ends, illness strikes, disability affects earning capacity or old age makes regular work difficult. For millions of workers, particularly those employed in the informal sector, this assurance remains one of the most important concerns of everyday life.

 

Economic growth, industrial expansion and technological advancement have transformed the nature of employment in India. Traditional forms of employment are increasingly accompanied by contractual arrangements, self-employment, gig work and platform-based occupations. While these changes have created new opportunities, they have also brought uncertainty in earnings, employment continuity and access to workplace benefits. A person may find work today but have little assurance about tomorrow. In such circumstances, social security is no longer simply an additional employment benefit; it is an essential component of economic stability and human dignity.

 

India’s expanding social-protection framework represents an important effort to address this challenge. According to the figures provided, social-protection coverage increased from 19 per cent in 2015 to 68.4 per cent in 2026, bringing more than one billion people within its reach. This expansion reflects the growing importance attached to social protection in the country’s development priorities. However, the larger question is not merely how many people are covered, but whether the protection available to them is sufficient, accessible and dependable when they need it most.

Social security must ultimately be judged by the difference it makes in people’s lives. A worker who spends decades contributing to the economy should not have to face financial insecurity after retirement. A family should not be pushed into hardship because its principal earning member dies. Similarly, a person who loses employment or faces a medical emergency should have some institutional protection rather than being left entirely dependent on personal savings or family support.

This is where institutions such as the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) acquire particular significance.

EPFO and the foundation of long-term financial security

The EPFO occupies an important position in India’s social-security architecture. Functioning under the Ministry of

Labour and Employment, it administers provident fund, pension and insurance benefits for eligible employees. Its importance lies in the fact that it connects a worker’s years of employment with financial protection extending beyond the period of active service.

For a salaried employee, regular provident fund contributions may appear to be a routine deduction from monthly earnings. Yet, over time, these contributions accumulate into savings that can provide financial support during retirement and certain emergencies. The system also offers a degree of continuity when employees change jobs, allowing their provident fund accumulations to remain connected through a Universal Account Number (UAN).

The EPFO’s social-security framework rests on three important pillars: provident fund savings, pension benefits and insurance protection. Together, these address different stages of a worker’s life and provide support against different forms of financial vulnerability.

The Employees’ Provident Funds Scheme enables eligible members to accumulate retirement savings through regular contributions and interest. It also provides for partial withdrawals for specified needs, including medical treatment, education, marriage and housing, subject to prescribed conditions. Such provisions recognise that workers may encounter financial difficulties long before retirement and may need access to a portion of their accumulated savings.

The Employees’ Pension Scheme provides monthly pension benefits to eligible members upon superannuation, retirement or disability. It also extends pension support to eligible family members of deceased members. For elderly people who no longer have a regular source of income, a pension can make a significant difference to their ability to meet everyday expenses.

The Employees’ Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme adds another layer of protection by providing insurance benefits to eligible EPF members in the event of death while in service. The benefit, which can go up to Rs 7 lakh under the framework described in the supplied material, offers financial assistance to families at a particularly difficult time without requiring a separate insurance premium from the member.

These three components demonstrate why social security must be viewed as an integrated system rather than a collection of unrelated schemes. Savings provide support after working life, pensions offer a recurring source of income, and insurance protects dependants against sudden loss.

Expanding coverage: Reaching more workers

One of the most significant indicators of social-security expansion is the growth in EPFO membership. According to the figures provided, contributing membership increased from 3.49 crore in 2014-15 to approximately 7.98 crore as of September 16, 2026. This represents an increase of around 4.49 crore contributing members.

The institutional network has expanded as well, with approximately 7.68 lakh establishments contributing to EPFO as of September 2026. This wider base is important because the effectiveness of a social-security institution depends not only on its policies but also on the number of workers and establishments brought within its framework.

Pension coverage has also grown. The number of pensioners receiving benefits increased from 51.04 lakh in 2014-15 to around 82 lakh by September 2026. This increase of more than 31 lakh pensioners reflects the expanding role of pension support in providing financial stability to retired workers and eligible family members.

The volume of claims settled offers another indication of the scale at which the institution operates. EPFO settled 1.30 crore claims during 2014-15, compared with 6.42 crore claims in the one-year period reported up to October 2026.

These figures point towards a substantial expansion in membership, pension disbursement and service delivery. They also underline the growing expectations placed on the institution. As membership increases, the responsibility to ensure timely claim settlement, accurate records, transparent procedures and responsive grievance redressal becomes even greater.

Expansion must therefore be accompanied by institutional capacity. Workers should not have to navigate complicated procedures or repeatedly approach offices to access benefits that are legally available to them. The larger the social-security network becomes, the more important it is to make its functioning simple and reliable.

Making provident fund access more responsive to workers’ needs

A major challenge in any contributory social-security system is maintaining a balance between long-term savings and immediate financial requirements. Workers need to build retirement funds, but they also face emergencies during their working years. A medical crisis, the education of children, marriage-related expenses or the need to purchase a house can create financial pressure.

EPFO’s efforts to simplify partial withdrawals seek to address this reality. The consolidation of 13 provisions governing partial withdrawals into three broad categories — Essential Needs, Housing Needs and Special Circumstances — is intended to make the framework easier to understand and navigate.

The revised withdrawal provisions also increase flexibility for specified purposes. Under the framework described in the supplied material, eligible members can make up to 10 withdrawals for education and five for marriage, compared with the earlier combined limit of three withdrawals for both purposes. The framework also allows eligible members to withdraw up to 75 per cent of their provident fund balance, including employee and employer contributions, subject to applicable conditions. The minimum service requirement has been standardised at 12 months.

Such changes recognise that financial security cannot be separated from the realities of family life. A worker may have accumulated savings but still struggle to meet an urgent expense. Allowing access to a portion of those savings can prevent dependence on high-interest borrowing and provide relief during difficult circumstances.

However, flexibility must not undermine the fundamental purpose of provident fund savings. Retirement income security requires a sufficient accumulated balance. Workers should therefore be made aware of the long-term consequences of frequent withdrawals and encouraged to preserve their savings wherever possible.

The increase in the auto-settlement limit for eligible advance claims to Rs 5 lakh is another important service-related reform. Automated processing can reduce delays and minimise unnecessary human intervention. Similarly, removing the requirement to upload cheque-leaf images or attested bank passbooks for eligible online claims reduces paperwork and makes the process more convenient.

For an ordinary employee, such changes are not merely administrative improvements. They determine how quickly financial assistance reaches a household when it is needed.

Digital transformation and the changing face of public services

Technology is increasingly becoming central to the delivery of social-security benefits. EPFO’s digital initiatives reflect an effort to make services accessible without requiring members to depend entirely on physical offices or lengthy paperwork.

The Universal Account Number is an important part of this transformation. It provides a permanent identification number to an EPFO member and connects provident fund accounts across different establishments. This is particularly useful for employees who change jobs, as it helps maintain continuity in their provident fund records and accumulated savings, subject to the verification requirements.

The facility for workers to generate their own UAN, introduced in November 2019, has further simplified enrolment. The introduction of Aadhaar-based Face Authentication Technology through the UMANG application in April 2025 added another digital route for UAN generation and activation. According to the supplied figures, 1.74 crore self-generated UANs had been reported by October 2026.

Digital access through UMANG has also expanded considerably, with approximately 709 crore EPFO transactions reported from January 2017 to October 21, 2026. This indicates the scale at which members are using digital platforms to access services.

The facility to seed or correct Aadhaar details through the UAN Member Portal is another step towards reducing dependence on physical documentation. Employers can approve requests when the relevant details match, while mismatched information can be referred to the concerned EPFO office for correction.

Yet, digitalisation must not create a new form of exclusion. India has a large workforce with varying levels of digital literacy, internet access and familiarity with online systems. Older employees, workers in rural areas and people with limited access to smartphones may find digital procedures difficult.

A successful digital system must therefore combine online convenience with accessible human assistance. Local support facilities, clear instructions, multilingual guidance and effective grievance redressal are essential to ensure that technology serves every worker rather than only those who are digitally comfortable.

Pension delivery and dignity in old age

 

Retirement should be a stage of life marked by dignity and relative financial stability, not uncertainty about receiving a monthly pension. For elderly people, even a short interruption in pension payments can create serious difficulties.

The Centralised Pension Payment System (CPPS) is an important initiative in this regard. It enables pension disbursement through any bank branch across the country, reducing the need to transfer Pension Payment Orders when pensioners move to another location or change their bank branch. This is particularly relevant for retired employees who return to their hometowns after completing their service.

The initiative can reduce administrative complications and make pension access more convenient. The facility also seeks to minimise the need for pensioners to visit bank branches for verification at the commencement of pension.

Another important measure is the partnership between EPFO and India Post Payments Bank for doorstep Digital Life Certificate services. Under this arrangement, EPFO bears the cost of Rs 50 per certificate, making the service free for pensioners.

For elderly people living in remote and rural areas, travelling to a bank or designated office merely to submit a life certificate can be physically demanding and expensive. Doorstep services can reduce this burden and help ensure continuity in pension payments. They are particularly valuable for people with limited mobility and those living far from administrative facilities.

Such initiatives remind us that the effectiveness of social security is often determined by seemingly small administrative details. A pension system may exist on paper, but its real value lies in whether an elderly person receives the money on time without unnecessary hardship.

Wage ceiling revision and the need to widen formal coverage

One of the important reforms highlighted in the supplied material is the revision of the wage ceiling for mandatory EPFO coverage.

The ceiling was last revised in September 2014, when it was increased from Rs 6,500 to Rs 15,000 per month. A further increase to Rs 25,000 per month was approved in September 2026. The revision is expected to bring more than 51 lakh additional employees within mandatory coverage, subject to applicable statutory provisions.

The importance of this decision must be understood in the context of changing wage levels and the expansion of formal employment. A wage ceiling that remains unchanged for a prolonged period can exclude employees whose salaries have increased over time, even though their need for long-term financial protection remains relevant.

Increasing the ceiling can widen the pool of employees eligible for mandatory coverage and help extend provident fund and related benefits to more workers. It also reflects the need to periodically review social-security provisions in response to economic realities.

However, widening the wage ceiling alone cannot resolve the larger challenge of social-security exclusion. A considerable section of India’s workforce remains outside conventional employer-employee arrangements. Daily-wage workers, domestic workers, agricultural labourers, street vendors, self-employed individuals and many other informal workers may not have access to the same institutional protection.

This is why the expansion of formal employment and the development of suitable social-security mechanisms for informal workers must progress together.

Beyond EPFO: Protecting the informal workforce

The importance of social security becomes even greater when we consider the scale and diversity of India’s unorganised workforce. Many people work without regular salaries, written contracts or employer-sponsored benefits. Their income may fluctuate according to seasonal demand, availability of work and local economic conditions.

For these workers, retirement planning and protection against disability, illness or loss of livelihood can be particularly difficult.

The e-Shram portal, launched in August 2021, represents an important effort to identify and connect unorganised workers with social-security programmes. It created an Aadhaar-seeded National Database of Unorganised Workers, with each registered worker receiving a Universal Account Number.

The portal had recorded 31.89 crore registrations by August 2026, according to the supplied figures. Its One-Stop Solution, launched in October 2024, integrates 15 social-security and welfare schemes. It also connects workers with platforms such as the National Career Service, Skill India Digital Hub and myScheme.

The significance of e-Shram goes beyond registration. A reliable database can help the government understand the composition of the informal workforce, identify gaps in coverage and improve the delivery of welfare benefits. Linking workers with employment and skill-development platforms can also create opportunities for improving their economic prospects.

Nevertheless, registration should be treated as the beginning of social protection, not its final outcome. A worker’s name appearing in a database does not automatically mean that the person has received meaningful financial assistance, pension support or insurance protection. The effectiveness of the platform will depend on how efficiently registered workers are connected with actual benefits.

The Pradhan Mantri Shram Yogi Maandhan scheme is another effort directed towards old-age income security among eligible unorganised workers. It is a voluntary and contributory pension scheme for workers aged between 18 and 40 years with monthly incomes of up to Rs 15,000. It provides for a minimum assured pension of Rs 3,000 per month after the age of 60, subject to prescribed conditions.

Monthly contributions range from Rs 55 to Rs 200 depending on the age of enrolment, with an equal contribution from the Central Government.

The scheme recognises a fundamental problem faced by informal workers: the absence of a dependable pension after they stop working. For people who spend their lives in occupations without formal retirement benefits, even a modest assured pension can provide an important measure of security.

However, awareness, affordability and continuity of contributions remain essential to the success of voluntary pension arrangements. Workers with irregular incomes may struggle to contribute consistently. Outreach and assistance must therefore be designed around the realities of their employment and financial circumstances.

Social assistance and the protection of vulnerable families

A comprehensive social-security system must also recognise that not everyone can participate in contributory schemes. Elderly people without sufficient savings, persons with disabilities, widows and families that lose their primary breadwinner may require direct public assistance.

The National Social Assistance Programme has provided an important framework for such support. The revised Pradhan Mantri Samajik Sahayata Yojana, as described in the supplied material, seeks to continue this assistance during the period from 2026-27 to 2030-31.

Its provisions include monthly assistance for eligible elderly persons, widows and persons with disabilities, along with one-time financial support for households that lose their primary breadwinner.

The disability pension provisions provide monthly assistance of Rs 375 to eligible beneficiaries below 80 years and Rs 625 to those aged 80 and above. The reduction in the benchmark disability threshold from 80 per cent to 40 per cent, along with the removal of the minimum age criterion, is intended to extend eligibility to a wider group.

The old-age pension provides Rs 200 per month to eligible persons aged 60-79 years and Rs 500 to those aged 80 years and above. The widow pension provides Rs 300 to eligible widows aged 40-79 years and Rs 500 to those aged 80 years and above. The family benefit component provides one-time assistance of Rs 20,000 to eligible households following the death of the primary breadwinner aged between 18 and 59 years.

These provisions reflect the principle that social protection is not exclusively about employment. It is also about supporting people who are unable to earn a livelihood or who face circumstances beyond their control.

At the same time, the adequacy of assistance deserves continuous attention. The cost of food, medicines, transport and other essential needs can place considerable pressure on households with little or no regular income. Financial assistance must therefore be periodically reviewed to ensure that it remains meaningful in the face of inflation and changing living costs.

The Social Security Code and the future of worker protection

The Code on Social Security, 2020, represents an effort to bring several existing labour laws relating to social security into a unified legislative framework. It consolidates nine central labour laws and provides for benefits relating to provident fund, pensions, insurance, maternity benefits, gratuity and other forms of worker protection.

One of its significant features is the recognition of gig and platform workers within the social-security framework. This is particularly important as employment patterns continue to change and a growing number of people earn their livelihoods through digital platforms and independent work arrangements.

The Code provides for the formulation of social-security schemes for such workers, supported by a social-security fund. It also contains provisions relating to maternity benefits, fixed-term employment and gratuity.

Eligible fixed-term employees are entitled to proportionate gratuity after one year of service, subject to applicable conditions. Women-centric provisions include maternity benefits of up to 26 weeks for eligible women, the option of working from home where the nature of work permits and crèche facilities in establishments meeting prescribed requirements.

These provisions reflect an attempt to make social protection more responsive to the changing nature of employment and the needs of different categories of workers.

However, legislation alone cannot guarantee protection. The real challenge lies in effective implementation, awareness and enforcement. Workers must know what benefits they are entitled to, employers must comply with statutory obligations and institutions must have the capacity to deliver services without unnecessary delays.

Compliance reforms and institutional accountability

The success of a social-security system also depends on cooperation between employers, employees and the institutions responsible for administering benefits.

Simplifying compliance procedures can encourage establishments to participate in the formal social-security framework. In this context, initiatives such as VISHWAS 2026 and AMNESTY 2026 seek to address certain compliance-related difficulties.

VISHWAS provides for the one-time settlement of eligible disputes involving damages or penalties under the EPF and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and the Code on Social Security, 2020. It aims to reduce litigation and encourage voluntary compliance through a digital and time-bound process. Eligible cases are subject to specified conditions and exclusions, including those involving fraud, misappropriation and deliberate falsification.

AMNESTY, meanwhile, provides an opportunity for eligible establishments to regularise provident fund trusts that have not obtained formal exemption despite meeting prescribed conditions. The scheme remains open until December 28, 2026, according to the supplied material.

Such measures can help address historical compliance gaps and improve the relationship between establishments and regulatory institutions. But simplification should not mean weakening the protection of workers. Compliance reforms must preserve the basic principle that statutory contributions and benefits belong to employees and that their interests must remain protected.

Measuring success beyond numbers

India’s social-security expansion is significant, but the next stage requires a shift from measuring coverage alone to assessing the quality of protection.

A large membership base, millions of registrations and an expanding digital infrastructure are important indicators of institutional progress. Yet, they do not fully explain whether a worker can access benefits without difficulty, whether pension payments are adequate, whether claims are settled on time or whether informal workers receive meaningful assistance.

There is also a need to address differences in awareness and access across regions and occupations. Workers in remote areas may have limited access to information, while those in informal employment may not understand the available schemes or eligibility conditions. Migrant workers, in particular, need systems that allow them to access benefits without being constrained by changes in their place of work or residence.

The future of social security will also depend on how effectively institutions respond to the changing employment landscape. Gig and platform workers, contractual employees and people with multiple sources of income require protection mechanisms that recognise the realities of their work.

Technology can help make this transition easier, but it must remain a means of inclusion rather than an obstacle. Similarly, expanding contributory schemes must go hand in hand with social assistance for people who cannot afford regular contributions.

Most importantly, social-security benefits must retain their value over time. Pension amounts, assistance levels and coverage thresholds require periodic review in response to inflation, wage growth and changing economic conditions.

Towards a more inclusive social-security system

A worker’s contribution to the economy does not end with the completion of a job or retirement from service. Every individual who participates in economic activity deserves a reasonable measure of protection against uncertainty, illness, disability, unemployment and old age.

India’s expanding social-security architecture, with EPFO at its centre and complementary initiatives such as e-Shram, PM-SYM and social-assistance programmes, provides an important foundation for this objective. Reforms in digital access, claim settlement, pension delivery and coverage expansion indicate an effort to make the system more responsive to the needs of its beneficiaries.

But the journey towards universal social security remains a continuing responsibility. It requires stronger institutions, effective implementation, adequate benefits, greater public awareness and special attention to workers who remain outside traditional employment arrangements.

The real achievement of social security will not be measured simply by the number of accounts opened, registrations completed or claims processed. It will be measured by whether an elderly pensioner can live with dignity, whether a worker can meet an emergency without falling into debt, whether a family can withstand the loss of its breadwinner and whether an informal worker can look towards old age without fear of complete financial dependence.

Economic development is meaningful only when its benefits extend beyond those who are already secure. A truly inclusive economy must recognise that workers deserve protection not only while they are productive but also when circumstances make them vulnerable.

Social security, therefore, is not merely an administrative responsibility or a welfare measure. It is a commitment to dignity, fairness and shared prosperity. Building a system that protects every worker, irrespective of the nature of employment, will be one of the most important tests of India’s ambition to create an inclusive and secure future.


The article is based on the inputs and background information provided by the Press Information Bureau (PIB). Author is Writer, Policy Commentator. He can be mailed at kcprmijk@gmail.com

Comments are closed.